All risksRisks of Imported · Risk 4 of 5

Environmental Destruction Overseas

Cyanide fishing on coral reefs. Mangroves cleared for prawn ponds. Bottom trawling on unsurveyed seamounts. Choosing imported seafood often means subsidising practices Australia banned decades ago.

35%+Of mangroves lost globally — much to shrimp aquaculture

Mangroves vs shrimp ponds

Tropical shrimp aquaculture in SE Asia, Central America, and Africa has been one of the largest single drivers of mangrove loss — destroying coastal nurseries, increasing storm-surge risk, and emitting massive amounts of stored carbon.

  • FAO estimates 30%+ global mangrove loss since 1980 — much driven by aquaculture
  • Coastal nurseries lost reduce ALL nearby fisheries productivity
  • Mangrove carbon emissions when destroyed are 3–5× higher than tropical forest

Cyanide & dynamite fishing

Coral reef fish for the live-fish-trade and aquarium trade are still routinely caught using cyanide in parts of SE Asia. Dynamite fishing destroys reefs in seconds. Australian reef fisheries (coral trout, red emperor) operate under line-caught quotas.

Unregulated bottom trawling

Some imported seafood comes from deep-sea trawl fisheries operating on under-surveyed seamounts and sensitive habitats — fisheries that could not operate under Australian environmental law. Orange roughy stocks are a global cautionary tale.

Sources

  1. FAO mangrove loss data Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN
  2. WWF shrimp aquaculture impacts WWF
  3. Greenpeace / EJF cyanide fishing reports Greenpeace / Environmental Justice Foundation

See all citations on /research →

Australia did the hard work — choose accordingly

The environmental case for Australian seafood is overwhelming.

Why Australian: environment